Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Mixed reception over plans for 540 houses


Are you in favour of the Wellingborough East development? Post your comments at the bottom of the page

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
19 August 2008
There has been a mixed reaction to plans for 540 new homes as part of a major regeneration in a town.
Supporters of the Wellingborough East development in Eastfield Road say it will spruce up a depressed area that has been left to rot with derelict buildings and empty land.

However, a large group of residents has formed to protest against proposal
s for the site near Wellingborough railway station, saying it will affect their quality of life and cause severe traffic problems.

Council officers now look set to take more time to resolve the issues and have recommended that planning permission be delegated to the "proper officer".

The authority also wants Bee Bee Developments, which is behind the plans, to sign a Section 106 agreement under planning law, which would commit them financially to providing infrastructure including roads and utilities with the site.

A report by Wellingborough Council planning officers says: "There are still a number of detailed matters that need to be agreed with the applicant."

The issue of what to do with the Eastfield Road site has been subject to intense debate for more than a decade. Several planning applications have been made for industrial use over the past 16 years.

The current plans focus more on transforming it into a thriving community with 540 flats and 27 work units, plus up to 6.6 hectares of
open space and landscaping.

Access roads are to be built to cope with increased traffic flow and up to 834 car parking spaces could be created.

However, amid concerns that traffic will become unbearable at rush hour in an already busy part of town, planners have promised to encourage cycling and walking with footpath links and up to 574 cycle park spaces.

A spokesman for Bee Bee Developments said building on a dilapidated brownfield site would vastly improve the quality of the area and transform it into a vibrant part of the community.

But Kevin Jones, from nearby Colwell Road, said: "It would impact immensely.

"The traffic is constant at the moment and it does impact on your quality of life.

"You put your life on the line crossing the road and I am often woken
by lorries in the night."

If the plans are given the green light, Bee Bee Developments would look to start building as soon as possible despite worries of an economic downturn.



The full article contains 403 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 August 2008 9:33 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Kettering
 
Prev
1
Next
1

NicB,

W'boro 19/08/2008 16:22:08
I live nearby, I can vouch for the level of traffic being ridiculous. Building more houses without improving the local infrastructure is a ludicrous proposal.

During term time, Eastfield and Elsden roads are at capacity during the rush hour, and adding more housing in the area is going to tip that over into regular and lengthy congestion.

Before these houses are completed, the Eastern link road needs doing (a link from Finedone Road to the A45 will take most of the trucks and a lot of the through traffic off), and the junction of Elsden/Midland/Senwick needs upgrading with proper pedestrian crossings, traffic lights and provisions for cyclists.

Other lesser options would be to place bollards at the top and bottom of Elsden and Eastfield, blocking trucks. Or make it one-way, reclaiming one side of the road for a decent cycle way and more parking for residents. Of course both of these are a huge inconvenience and won't be popular with the rat-runners currently clogging the area up.

It's good that Bee Bee are proposing decent foot and cycle access, but the problem is the surrounding infrastructure is inadaquate.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.