Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Supervision

Mum has nine kids taken away

Mother 'addicted to having children with controlling ex-husband'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 September 2007
A MOTHER addicted to having children has seen all nine taken into care because of her inability to break away from her controlling ex-husband.

Six of the children have been taken away for adoption, two are in long-term foster care and yesterday a judge ordered the youngest child to be taken away from the mother and made available for adoption.

The Appeal Court in London was told the wo
man from Wellingborough, who cannot be named for legal reasons, felt compelled to get pregnant every two years.

The woman's ex-husband has a history of temper tantrums and was described by Lord Justice Wilson as "a Svengali-like character with a complex, controlling and self-centred personality".

The judge said: "While the couple were together, children in their care had suffered substantial neglect. He had a violent temper and their lack of a supporting social network only increased their dependence on each other."

One expert who had examined the youngest girl had described her as "extremely troubled" and said she had shut down her emotions, disabling herself from forming normal relationships.

The expert also said the mother seemed compelled to get pregnant every time the youngest child became about two-years-old.

The judge said the mother had tried to break away from the father's influence and had only managed to keep her youngest daughter for her first six years of life after she insisted their relationship was finally over.

The couple divorced in 2005 and the mother lived with the little girl while the father was absent from the family home. However, the mother eventually allowed him back into her life.

There was an incident in which he banged a table and shouted at the little girl, who fled to her room.

After that, the mother told the former husband to leave, but he again managed to get himself back in favour.

The judge said: "The couple have not permanently separated and continued their relationship, at least off and on."

In May, a Northampton County Court judge issued a permanent care order and freed the little girl for adoption. She had a "goodbye visit" with her mother later that month, since when there has been no direct contact between them.

The father argued the adoption order amounted to a violation of his human rights and claimed Northamptonshire County Council had not tried hard enough to keep the girl with her natural family.

He also argued there had been no proper assessment of their parenting skills. However, Lord Justice Wilson, sitting with Lord Justice Rix, said the family's problems lay within the personalities of the parents and the decision to take the seven-year-old away for adoption was "impregnable".



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 September 2007 9:15 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Kettering
 
Prev
1
Next
1

,

07/09/2007 22:49:21
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
2

Teresa Hennessy,

Clacton on Sea 07/09/2007 23:13:47
Are we to believe that this little girl will be less troubled placed for adoption with strangers,Social services are failing in their duty of care to this child and her siblings if all efforts including family therapy have not been offered. There is a growing concern that social services are meeting adoption targets for financial gain even though it is not always in the childs best interests.
3

Noreen,

Canada 08/09/2007 02:21:54
It is asbsolutely appaling that because the system is set up for monetary gain, a family that more than likely with family councilling could remain a family, instead is being split up and being offered for adoption. The odds of all the siblings being adopted into one family are slim to none, so not only are they losing the contact and ability to grow up with their parents, they are losing the ability to grow up and know their siblings, grand parents, aunts, uncles etc etc. I want someone to tell me how this is in the best interests of the children. If even a quarter of the $$$ given for meeting their quotas on adoption was spent for counselling etc, children would not lose their families and their identities.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.