Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Supervision

Mobile speed cameras could be scrapped across Northamptonshire

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
28 November 2008
Mobile speed cameras may be scrapped from roadsides in Northamptonshire next year, the Evening Telegraph has learned.
The cameras, operated by the Northamptonshire Casualty Reduction Partnership, could be replaced because of a lack of public confidence in them and concerns about their effectiveness in improving road safety.

A review group was set up last year to look at the effectiveness of the cameras and it is believed that Northamptonshire County Council is seriously considering pulling funding for them. Any such move would have to be made in conjunction with the police, who are part of the casualty reduction partnership, which has a budget of £2m a year.

The Evening Telegraph understands significant savings could be made by abandoning the cameras.

Northamptonshire County Council leader Jim Harker would not confirm any decision had been made.

But he said: "This is an area I know the public are very concerned about.

"There are benefits but also a number of issues where they are not so confident about them. We will be reviewing it over the next few weeks.

"I know there have been concerns from the public and the RAC about them. There is evidence that people tend to react quickly to cameras and slow down sharply, creating hazards and possibly accidents.

"If cameras are not there, we are already looking at a wide range of speed reduction measures. We know the public are enthusiastic about vehicle activated signage, where approaching drivers are warned about their speed and people take more notice of these."

He added: "We shall be embarking on public consultation regarding it."

A decision could be made in the next few months, with the cameras disappearing by April. Static cameras are likely to remain in use.

A group set up in 2007 to monitor the effectivness of speed cameras in Northamptonshire reported its findings to the county council earlier this year.

The study suggested the use of mobile speed cameras should continue.

Motorist Margaret Keevil, of Orchard Field in Cranford, said: "I think they should be used. If people were keeping to the speed limit, they have nothing to worry about. Accidents happen when people don't stick to the speed limit."

A spokesman for the RAC said the use of mobile speed cameras should be judged on the merits of each area where they are used.

In October, Swindon became the first UK town to scrap speed cameras because its council objected to the fines revenue going to the Government.

The revenue from speeding fines issued in the county has increased by £2.3m in nine years. In 1997, tickets totalling £148,000 were issued, compared with 2006, when there were more than 17 times that, topping £2.5m. In the 12 months to August this year, 9,898 speeding offences were clocked by mobile cameras in the county.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 November 2008 8:11 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Kettering
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Mark Winspear,

Kettering 28/11/2008 10:51:40
Cllr Tony Sharp is absolutely correct.
However, I feel the mobile cameras should be retained, they perform a useful function, although I do sometimes wonder why they aren't deployed more sensibly.
Maybe a change to the revenue collected from Camera speeding fines to diectly to road traffic police instead of some of the tin-pot "road safety" measures currently employed would make sense.
Tony's point about the degree of dangerous and inadequate driving underlines my view that ALL drivers should be re-tested rigorously every 3-5 years. Driving is a privilege,not a right.
2

Eggnchips,

Northants 28/11/2008 12:43:04
I agree with Cllr Sharp, I would also mention the steady decline in driver behaviour that can be witnessed every day. The central lane "hoggers" on motorways have now moved to lane 3, this invites people to undertake and they carry out one of the worst possible moves when they indicate and just pull over regardless of the vehicles outside them. I was always taught not to make a move that causes another car to brake. It now seems the norm. I believe that over agressive driving and poor quality roads (the A43 for instance) must be a factor in a lot of these accidents. Three times in the past month I have had to practically stop to avoid an oncoming overtaking car on the stretch between Kettering and Northampton, what goes through their minds when they do these things is beyond me, the problem is that they will get away with it until they have an accident. There definately seem to be fewer traffic police around and motorways now seem to be left in the control of the Highways Agency patrol vehicles who no doubt do a very good job but they are not enforcers.
3

couldn't make it up,

28/11/2008 21:02:00
It's about time we had some good news like this. Now lets get rid of the other pain on the road, drivers with SATNAV who sleep drive!
4

slever,

01/12/2008 19:38:37
Well done Cllr Seerey and Northamptonshire County Council, you must you carry through your proposals, indeed, go further and extend the review to fixed cameras. We all now know that speed cameras haven't produced significant reductions in road casualties, in fact in recent years the figures have started to rise.

Improvements in passenger car technology has had more to do with saving lives, reducing injuries and curtailing car thefts. If we can improve the quality and skill of drivers we will all be safer - and freer to.

Speed cameras catch motorists indiscriminately, are an easy way of clobbering the largely law abiding, target people who generally pay up on time, and now only serve to generate fine revenue for central Government.

Cllr Sean Lever.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.