Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Supervision

Anger over points plan

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
17 November 2009
Taxi drivers are furious about plans to introduce a penalty points system that could see them have their licences revoked.
Nearly 60 cabbies have signed a petition opposing a Corby Council move they say provides an excuse for drivers to be suspended.

The Sky Cabs Association, which represents drivers in the town, said the authority should be helping the industry through the recession as opposed to introducing a "petty" penalty points system.

Members of the One Corby Policy Committee are being recommended to approve the controversial system at their meeting tonight.

A list of 30 offences for which points would be given include "unsatisfactory behaviour or conduct" including "wearing football tops", obstructing a council officer and unreasonably prolonging a journey.

A spokesman for Sky Cabs said: "We are of the understanding that if a council governs the taxi trade, there must be at least some obligation to ensure that all participants within the trade are earning a living at least above the minimum wage.

"Instead, we are hit with a list of rule enforcements that we as customers of the council are not prepared to accept under this current climate.

"The proposal appears vague and to a certain degree unprofessional, raising concerns with the way they intend to deal with our trade during these uncertain times.

"We haven't received any notification about tonight's meeting.

"The taxi officer is given complete autonomy through these rules."

Taxi driver Kevin Donelan said: "Many of the rules come under existing legislation anyway. Not having a driving licence, for instance, is the law of the land. This is completely unnecessary."

If approved, the system would mean that cabbies being issued with more than 12 penalty points could be suspended after consideration from the authority's licensing panel.

Health protection manager for Corby Council, Damian Wilkins, said: "While the majority of licence holders abide by the rules, there is a small number of drivers that consistently do not.

"Officers' time is regularly unnecessarily spent chasing up drivers who do not produce required information on time and who contravene council conditions, for example, not wearing badges.

"The primary objective is to improve the levels of compliance within the hire vehicle trade which would subsequently help improve the standards, safety and protection for the travelling public."

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 17 November 2009 8:56 AM
  • Source: Northants Evening Telegraph
  • Location: Kettering
 
Prev
1
2
1

AndAnd,

17/11/2009 09:11:32
I thought this was actualy a good idea until I saw "obstructing a council officer" was an offence.
Does this mean that cab drivers will have to get out of the way of any council officers driving on the roads or risk loosing their license?

Sounds more like the councilors feel they are to good to get stuck in traffic jams like the rest of us!

2

Ray Rodden,

Corby 17/11/2009 09:39:20
Think obstucting a council officer really means that if an officer is trying to do his job and verify compliance with the law and rules a driver deliberatly refuses to cooperate, not giving answers within a reasonable time, etc.

'Wearing football tops' seems a little excessive unless they mean that drivers should be of smart appearance to represent the town . If so, perhaps they should claim a clothing allowance rom the taxman as it now seems CBC want ir to be part of their conditions of employment
3

Ray Rodden,

Corby 17/11/2009 09:40:58
PS Wonder how many councillors will declare an interest before the meeting - seems an inordinate amount of councillors also have shares, work for, own taxis!
4

Bobby85,

Kettering 17/11/2009 10:39:15
This does seem a bit excessive. Obstructing a council officers is an offence in itself, the council can get the Police involved if an officer can't carry out checks he is obliged to do.

As for wearing football tops, admitidly it doesn't look smart, but its maybe more comfortable for drivers who are sitting in a cab for 9 or more hours a day. Aslong as they are safe what differnce does it make if they wear a football top or suit??
5

Mr Drage,

out of town 17/11/2009 11:36:31
As long as they don't expect these people to actually be able to drive safely I can't see a problem...
6

mehetinmehmeh,

corby 17/11/2009 15:44:25
I think that this is a good idea. Mainly because of the Wreckless taxi drivers that form, in my opinion the majority of the service in corby. Hardly any of them wear seatbelts, constantly driving up the backsides of cars infront (being agressive), constantly turning the Intercom back on, after you have turned it off to privatly talk to the people with you without some nosy sod you dont know listening in, (i actually have had an occasion where i had to turn the intercom off five times before the idiot got the point)

There should be Constant supervision of the taxi drivers when they are on the road. The service needs to improve. and the typical corby attitude of "the world owes me a favour" that the cabbies are showing by signing this, worthless (as it wont stop the council if they really want to do it) petition just goes to show that THEY HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE.

7

cassiecasscass,

Corby, Northants, 17/11/2009 16:08:35
Yes I Think its a great Idea, I always wear my seat belt when getting into the sky cabs as i am sick of the way they drive, not caring that they have passengers in there cabs, like for myself for example I am Pregnant and there has been a few times where i was going to make complaints against different drivers, there speeding for number 1) ur suppose to go slowly over the speed bumps and the taxi drivers don't slow down at all, there Attitude towards you is just sick altogether,

when i haven't been in the taxi's and my parents are driving the taxi drivers are so aggressive no wonder why three of the taxi's from this sky cabs have been involved in accidents,

the taxi drivers can carry on to be angry, its about time something happens to sort them out, I am considering using the buses now i am that scared for my own safety,


8

JM62,

Corby 17/11/2009 18:49:43
mehetinmehmeh: Hackney cab drivers are not legally required to wear a seatbelt within their licence area due to the nature of the job involving constant getting in and out of the vehicle.

The intercom is there not only for the driver to be able to hear your destination at commencement of trip, but to be able to hear when (and it always happens) when somebody changes their mind about where they actually want to go, I suggest if you want a private conversation you wait until you have left the vehicle, I can also assure you that 99.9% of drivers couldnt give a monkeys about your conversation unless you were actually plotting to mug them or do a runner from the cab.

It has always been a "No" to football tops due to the problems that can arise from picking up those who support rival teams and feel the need to deride (aggressively/abusively) those who dare to support anyone other than their team.

The council enforcers should spend time actually enforcing against those Private Hire drivers who actively ply for hire illegally on the street/outsid pubs/clubs etc and Public/Private hire drivers who actively "scalp" fares out of their licence area.
9

The Larkins.,

on the rank 17/11/2009 19:43:41
JM62..quote "Hackney cab drivers are not legally required to wear a seatbelt within their licence area due to the nature of the job involving constant getting in and out of the vehicle"...
That is no excuse for not wearing a seatbelt, it doesnt take a hour to click/unclick a seatbelt. A few seconds at the most. On average, how many fares do you have that involve getting out of the cab? I bet its not even 1 in 20, I've sat in MCd's many times and hardly anyone gets out of a cab. Apart from when they need a fag...
10

JM62,

Corby 17/11/2009 21:16:26
The Larkins, I never siad it was an excuse I said it is not a legal requirement, and I persomally never wore one due to getting out on average 15 out of 20 fares. Rose tinted glasses are no excuse for "Not Seeing".

All you whingers would whinge even louder if there wasnt a Taxi service in any town.

If you paid anywhere near the amount an owner of a cab has to pay the Council in test fees (twice yearly in Corby)on top of the high cost of maintaining said vehicle to then lose your livelyhood due to some of the petty things they want to introduce then maybe you would have the slightest inkling as to those guys founded complaint.



Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.