Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Playground approved despite safety fears


Do you support the play area? Let us know your views by posting your comments at the bottom of the page

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
10 July 2008
Plans for a controversial play area have been passed by councillors despite a dozen objections from local people.
The play area in Butland Road is part of a condition for developers Cofton to provide adequate recreational space for children moving into new homes on the Oakley Vale estate in Corby.

But residents say the area will become a magnet for anti-socia
l behaviour and is in a dangerous position next to a busy main road.

Councillors had rejected a similar application earlier this year but rubber-stamped the new blueprints at a development control committee meeting this week.

Locals have now appealed for a CCTV camera to be put in place at the site on the corner of Butland Road and Lyveden Way.

Resident Gary Manton, of Butland Road, said: "After attending the recent planning meeting regarding the play area, I have come to the conclusion t the planning committee have no interest in the opinions of families living in this area.

"Objections to this proposal had been put forward, with a strong emphasis on child safety, all ignored by the committee. Concerns had been raised about the speed at which people drive along this road, and the expected parking problems, both of which had been seen by the committee members before their meeting. There are no plans for traffic calming measures along this road. The expected noise pollution and vandalism on this site was also ignored.

"There are no plans to erect a security camera around this site as the council are not paying for it so they have not provided any funds for one."

Officers had recommended the plans be passed because the park was a sufficient distance from homes.

At the meeting, the committee decided older children would not want to congregate at a place meant for under-sevens.

Oakley Vale ward councillor David Simms said: "I think it's a disgrace that these plans were passed. I am not against a play area in Oakley Vale, just not in that location.

"It's irresponsible to encourage young children to play so close to a busy main road. We did pay for CCTV at another park in Oakley Vale but we can't do that again as our membership fund has now been stopped."



The full article contains 379 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 July 2008 6:07 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Kettering
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Oakley vale resident,

Oakley Vale 11/07/2008 15:31:05
I said on an earlier posting that there was no way that any amount of people would be able to stop this park going ahead.

We had exactly the same issue when one was built near our house on Oakley Vale.

Only time will tell, but this is likely to be yet another poorly planned nightmare for Oakley Vale residents.
2

Lavender Lamb,

Corby 11/07/2008 16:36:52
of course youths are happy to congregate at any play area - doesn't matter it was meant for under sevens.

I have visited the existing one near the pub with my children and have seen plenty of teenagers there happily sitting on the roundabout and swings - not all are foul but many of them smoke, spit, 'making out' and use foul language in the presence of young ones.

The litter that plagues this area is not generated by little ones - iron brew bottles, fag packets, beer cans etc. Plenty of evidence for the council that it is popular with older people.
3

Ray Rodden,

Corby 12/07/2008 13:00:09
'Committee decided older children would not want to congregate at a place ment for under children'

Ha Ha Ha - what planet do these councillors live on?

Look at most play areas and see older kids there in the evenings and late at night. See the litter and debris left.

The only thing that will stop this is plenty of lighting which you hope they don't smash and CCTV.
4

cleverzippy,

Kettering 14/07/2008 12:23:52
Surely the problem is modern day developers squeezing more and more houses onto plots of land leaving postage stamp gardens with no space for kids to play in the safety of their own homes.
5

fiona penrhyn,

oakley vale 21/07/2008 12:14:00
my house is opposite to where this ridiculous park is being built. The grass area is already being used by the kids of the area to play football cricket riding bikes it is used for a nice walk and for dog walking.why wreck an area enjoyed by so many people?
once the park is erected it will attract youths who will act anti socially. they already litter and vandalise the other park of course they will do it to this one too.the fact that they are building ot next to one of the busiest roads on the estate and next to an un fenced stream is proposterous. and as for the police coming to deal with any anti social behaviour well that will never happen they never did a thing about the cars parked on paths so buggys and disabled people cant get by safely. The council dont seem to care that we all spent an awful lot of money on houses with a lovely view, they dont care that it will devalue our houses, or the iminent threat of anti social behaviour on our doorstep so why would they even consider our childrens saftey?
The park should not be allowed to go ahead in this location why not use an area by the new primary scholl or next to the hospice?
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.